Legal Opinion

People v. Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied his right to counsel (see, US Const Sixth Amend; NY Const, art I, § 6) because the pretrial court erred in failing to provide him with counsel from June 29, 1992 to July 30, 1993. Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that defendant was not deprived of his right to counsel. The lack of counsel was caused by defendant having repeatedly advised the court that he would retain counsel, the court’s proper determination that he was ineligible for the Assigned Counsel program, and his failure to submit a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. WattsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. McKennaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API