Northridge v. Grenier
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action to recover an instalment' due on a written instrument, with interest. The instrument was duly protested and the action is against the indorser. The instrument, otherwise a promissory note' payable to the defendant in quarterly specified instalments, contained these words: “. . . with the right to anticipate any or all payments at any time . . . .” The single question for decision is whether an instrument payable in instalments, indisputably a promissory note in every other particular, is rendered nonnegotiable by reason of the right reserved to anticipate payments.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Union Trust Co. v. McGintyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Main v. County of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Stults v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Mahoney v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Madden v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Neiss v. BurwenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- State v. PUDWashington Supreme Court · 1973