Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland Heights v. Stross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 1983No. 45768PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPryatel, J.

The lower court granted appellee’s motion to suppress a written confession because the statement had not been made voluntarily. The city of Cleveland Heights appealed.

At approximately noon, defendant-appellee, Anthony Stross, who was nineteen years old and a stock clerk for Gold Circle in Cleveland Heights, was detained by security for questioning concerning the alleged theft of a radio. An alleged accomplice was also detained in a separate room. Appellee had been at work since 6:00 a.m. and was about to take a lunch break when security took him to an upstairs office, where he was held until…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Reck v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. State v. ParobekOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. City of East Cleveland v. OdetellahOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API