City of Cleveland Heights v. Stross
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPryatel, J.
The lower court granted appellee’s motion to suppress a written confession because the statement had not been made voluntarily. The city of Cleveland Heights appealed.
At approximately noon, defendant-appellee, Anthony Stross, who was nineteen years old and a stock clerk for Gold Circle in Cleveland Heights, was detained by security for questioning concerning the alleged theft of a radio. An alleged accomplice was also detained in a separate room. Appellee had been at work since 6:00 a.m. and was about to take a lunch break when security took him to an upstairs office, where he was held until…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Reck v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. ParobekOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- City of East Cleveland v. OdetellahOhio Court of Appeals · 1993