Legal Opinion

State v. Parobek

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1990No. 89-39PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause came before this court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County in Cleveland Heights v. Stross (1983), 10 Ohio App. 3d 246,10 OBR 343, 461 N.E. 2d 935, upon the following question:

“* * * [W]hether state action is a necessary predicate to a finding that a confession should be suppressed as not voluntary.”

We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Stross, supra, involved a confession obtained by store security supervisors (whose conduct…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PaliderOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cook v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. RadarOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. City of Cleveland Heights v. StrossOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Copeco, Inc. v. CaleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sahrbacker v. Lucerne Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Freeman v. Holzer Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Santana v. Auto-Owners InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Copeco, Inc. v. CaleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API