Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 24, 1995No. 1 CA-SA 94-0329PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

The state filed a special action petition seeking review of the superior court’s ruling that the state must demonstrate complete compliance with Department of Health Services (“DHS”) regulations before breath-test results are admissible as evidence in a prosecution for driving under the influence (“DUI”). The petition presents one issue: must the state submit a breath-test device’s quarterly control function reports in addition to the device’s monthly calibration reports to establish prima facie evidence that the testing device was in “proper operating condition at a time…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fuenning v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. VelascoArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NihiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Coffey v. ShiomotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. O'DELLCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. Coffey v. ShiomotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. DuberCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API