Legal Opinion
State v. O'DELL
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 30, 2002No. 2 CA-CR 2001-0031, 2 CA-CR 2001-0163, 2 CA-CR 2001-0164, 2 CA-CR 2001-0166, 2 CA-CR 2001-0167, 2 CA-CR 2001-0168, 2 CA-CR 2001-0169, 2 CA-CR 2001-0177, 2 CA-CR 2001-0190PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding J.
¶ 1 The superior court dismissed with prejudice charges of driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) and driving with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .10 or more against appellees, Terry L. O’Dell; Marcos T. Poblete; William W. Morgan; Miguel C. Avilez; Ike P. Jimmerson; Freddy E. Martinez; Eugene A. Vasquez; Rigoberto Lujan, Jr.; and Reginald C. Johnson (collectively “O’Dell”), after consolidating their cases. The court found that the state’s failure to preserve and disclose memory data from the intoxilyzer used to determine their BAC violated Rule 15.1,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. WillitsArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SpeerArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WombleArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- State of Arizona v. Robert Charles GlissendorfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. EsserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. MartinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.