Legal Opinion

Raynard v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1923No. 6 Div. 202PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster-, J.

The defendant was charged with’the violation of the-act approved Oc? tober 1, 1920. Said act is entitled “An act, to amend an act entitled, an act to prevent frauds and impositions upon the people of the state and to protect investors,” etc. This legislative enactment is commonly called'the “Blue Sky’Law.” Laws 1920, p. 60.

The indictment contained eight counts, each of which charged in the language of the statute ’ that the defendant did sell, or offer for sale in this state by means of an advertisement, circulars,’ or prospectus, or by other form of public offering, speculative securities,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ross v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Holmes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. State v. SkinnerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Robertson v. Business Boosters' Country ClubSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Robertson v. Business Boosters' Country ClubSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Gillespie v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API