Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Business Boosters' Country Club

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1925No. 3 Div. 696PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is the second ap: peal in the causé. For former decision, see Robertson v. Business Boosters’ Country Club, 210 Ala. 460, 98 So. 272.

In effect it was held that the fund alleged to have been converted, being paid in on subscriptions for stock in plaintiff corporation for the purpose of boring a test well for oil and gas in Montgomery county, was the property of the plaintiff; but, the funds having been applied in good faith to the purposes intended, the defendant should not, in an action equitable in character, be held to account for so much of the fund as was expended prior to January 4,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gunter v. LeckeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  2. Kenicott v. SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. General Electric Co. v. Town of Fort DepositSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Yarborough's Adm'r v. AvantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Ellis v. BatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hope of Alabama Lodge of Odd Fellows v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Dixie Rubber Co. v. CatoeMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Franklin v. Mortgage Guaranty & Security Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  4. McManus v. FultonMontana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API