Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Long

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 1924No. 6 Div. 208Published

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The cause was tried before a jury on counts 2 and 4 of the complaint as amended. Count 2 as amended alleges that defendant sold plaintiff stock in a corporation which was speculative, and that said corporation had not complied with the statutes relating to the sale of speculative securities. Count 4 of the complaint as amended was for money had and received.

Defendant pleaded, in short, by consent the general issue, wifh leave to -give in evidence any matter which, if well pleaded, was admissible, the statute of limitations of one year and the statute of frauds.

Pertinent provisions of the Blue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SkinnerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Robertson v. Business Boosters' Country ClubSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Raynard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Ex Parte MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API