Legal Opinion

St. Louis County v. Roth

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1983No. 45485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Defendant-respondent was originally charged in the associate circuit court with violation of St. Louis County, Mo., Rev. Ordinances, § 611.200 (1969) (“bad dogs”) and § 611.210 (1979) (“dog at large”).

Section 611.200 states in pertinent part,

611.200 — Bad Dogs, Notice. — When any fierce or dangerous dog or any one that has previously attacked or bitten any person or domestic animal, or possesses a propensity to attack or bite man or domestic animal; or cause annoyance to persons using the public roads, streets and sidewalks, or chase, worry or molest live stock, other dogs or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. LinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. Fine v. Waldman Mercantile CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. City of Mexico v. MerlineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. City of Richmond Heights v. BuehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Estill v. IannoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. St. Louis County v. GloreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Estill v. IannoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API