St. Louis County v. Glore
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
St. Louis County appeals from an order of the trial court sustaining motions to dismiss informations against four defendants. The parties have stipulated that the cases present the same legal issues for our determination. We reverse and remand.
Each defendant was charged with violating Sec. 706.070 of the St. Louis County Revised Ordinances in that they knowingly promoted obscene material by selling such material to police officers. Sec. 706.070 makes it unlawful “for any person for monetary consideration to knowingly promote any obscene material or to advertise, give notice or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Kansas City v. BottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- City of Mexico v. MerlineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Avanti Petroleum, Inc. v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Springfield v. StoviakMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of St. Peters v. Collene Velma LienemannMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022