Legal Opinion

Grange Insurance Ass'n v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1988No. 54634-7PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Due process precludes Washington courts from extending long-arm jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant unless that defendant has purposefully established minimum contacts here. At issue in the present case is if the State of Idaho purposefully established minimum contacts when it certified that particular cows were free of disease or infection, knowing that the cows would be immediately shipped to farmers in this state. Idaho inspected the cows in cooperation with a federal program designed to eradicate the outbreak of brucellosis, and consequently was acting at least in part for the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Shute v. Carnival Cruise LinesWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Lewis v. BoursWashington Supreme Court · 1992

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API