Eastern Oil Refining Co. v. Court of Burgesses
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Before discussing the facts or law pertaining to this case, the court desires to make its position clear on the plaintiff's allegation and claim that its business be exempt from municipal regulation because it is engaged in producing products helpful to the war effort. The claim has no merit. If the location in question were found unsuitable for the type of business conducted thereon, it would not prevent the plaintiff from relocating it in a more suitable location even if it involved added expense. While the plaintiff should be commended for its zeal in producing goods which may help the war…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Puleo v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Lonoke v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Sings v. City of JolietIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- State Ex Rel. Redgate v. WalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.