Legal Opinion
Puleo v. Goldberg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 8, 1942PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
This action was brought by Sally Puleo, who alleged in her complaint that she was riding as a passenger in a bus of the defendant Gray Line Bus Corporation, and that she was injured in a collision between the bus in which she was riding and an automobile owned by Morris Nussman and driven by his agent, Goldberg. She claimed that this collision was due to the negligence of the operators of the bus and the automobile. Nussman, the defendant who owned the automobile, filed a cross-complaint against the Bus Corporation setting up that his automobile was damaged in the collision by reason of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harral v. LevertySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- National Bank of Commerce of New London v. HowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Hubley Manufacturing & Supply Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Lowndes v. City National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
3Cited by21 opinions
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Springfield-Dewitt Gardens, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Palombizio v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Jackson v. ConlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Lapuk v. BlountConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.