Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Knecht v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1992No. 91AP-82Published

1ConcurrenceWhiteside, Judge

Although I concur in the judgment, my reasons vary to some extent from those set forth in the majority decision.

Although the Civil Rules do not. define what constitutes a “new trial” for purposes of Civ.R. 59, R.C. 2311.01 does define “trial” as follows: “A trial is a judicial examination of the issues, whether of law or of fact, in an action or proceeding.” See, also, Columbus Packing Co. v. State ex rel. Schlesinger (1922), 106 Ohio St. 469, 140 N.E. 376; and O’Connor v. Graff (1959), 111 Ohio App. 398, 14 O.O.2d 411, 160 N.E.2d 374.

However, I agree that determination of a Civ.R. 12(B)(6)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tschantz v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. O'Connor v. GraffOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API