Legal Opinion

State Bank of Commerce v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1930No. 3821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

This case is submitted on an agreed statement of facts, of which the following is the substance: In January, 1928, the State Bank of Commerce was selected by the state treasurer as a state depository under the provisions of article 2526, Rev. Civ. Stat. 1925. On January 16, 192S, the bank qualified as such depository by executing a bond in the sum of $21,000 with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as its surety. The bond was conditioned, as required by law, for the payment of all funds and money that might ■be deposited by the state treasurer with the bank. In December, 1928, the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Marshall v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Matter of Carnegie Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joanna Martinez Gonzalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API