Legal Opinion
Exocel Bio, Inc. v. Patrick Retif and Jillian Vogel
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 5, 2026No. 2:24-cv-05202Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EXOCEL BIO, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 24-5202 PATRICK RETIF and JILLIAN VOGEL, Defendants. Pappert, J. May 5, 2026 MEMORANDUM Exocel Bio, Inc. sued former employees Patrick Retif and Jillian Vogel, alleging, among other things, misappropriation of trade secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. Kimera Labs, Inc. moved to intervene because Exocel Bio, Retif and Vogel had purportedly misappropriated its trade secrets. The Court grants the motion. I A Kimera Labs, Inc. is a biotechnology company that sells…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Sierra Club v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.