Goodson v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
1. A witness is always presumed to be competent. Adams v. Barrett, 3 Ga. 277.
2. When a witness is objected to on the ground that he is incompetent *179to testify, the question must, as a general rule, be decided by the court. Code (1910), § 5856; Dowdy v. Watson, 115 Ga. 42 (41 S. E. 266).
3. If, upon the preliminary examination, the witness appears to be competent, he should be permitted to testify; but if from the evidence his competency is doubtful, his competency depending upon a question of fact, and the court submits to the jury the determination of such fact, the jury should be instructed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eastlick v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Estill v. Citizens & Southern BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Dowdy v. Watson & LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- State v. WildmanOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Merneigh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Knight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.