Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1938No. 26559PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The defendant Prank Scott was charged with having, controlling, and possessing intoxicating liquor. He was convicted; his motion for a new trial was overruled and he excepted.

Joe Smith, an officer and a witness for the State, testified: “I got a search warrant and asked the sheriff to go to Prank Scott’s house with me. We drove up in front of Prank Scott’s house and I got out of the automobile and started to the house. His wife *490started closing the door. I pushed it open and when I got to the bathroom Mrs. Frank Scott was flushing the toilet and pouring the whisky in it. I saved some of it in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Cuesta v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Dowdy v. Watson & LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Conoway v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Summers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Baggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Whitus v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API