Legal Opinion

Bland v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1953No. 18282PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. In grounds 1 and 2 of the amended motion for new trial, error is assigned on the court’s failure to disqualify two of the jurors comprising the panel drawn to try the defendant. After these jurors had qualified under the general voir dire questions, counsel for the defendant further examined them, as authorized by the act approved February 19, 1951 (Ga. L. 1951, pp. 214-216; Code, Ann. Supp., § 59-705). Error is assigned in each ground because the court failed to disqualify the juror and forced the defendant to exhaust a strike, after such juror had expressed an opinion that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Humphries v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Ethridge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Robinson v. MurraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Roach v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. State v. JacobNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API