Legal Opinion
LE
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1998No. ID 3356PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3356 In re Guo Yu LEI, Respondent File A42 733 363 - San Francisco Decided July 16, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel does not constitute an exception to the 180-day statutory limit for the filing of a motion to reopen to rescind an in absentia order of deportation under section 242B(c)(3)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c)(3)(A) (1994), on the basis of exceptional circumstances. Nancy A. Fellom, Esquire, San Francisco, California, for…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jose Borges v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Grace Bejar v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Hossain v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- A-ABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.