Legal Opinion
A-A
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1998No. ID 3357PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3357 In re A-A-, Respondent Decided July 16, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel does not constitute an exception to the 180-day statutory limit for the filing of a motion to reopen to rescind an in absentia order of deportation under section 242B(c)(3)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c)(3)(A) (1994), on the basis of exceptional circumstances. Socheat Chea, Esquire, Atlanta Georgia, for the respondent Keith E. Hunsucker, Assistant District…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rosmery Andia Amilcar E. Torrez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- ASSAADBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
- Maximtchouk v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Maximtchouk v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.