Legal Opinion

Jose Borges v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 30, 2005No. 04-1835PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Circuit Judge.

A motion to reopen a removal order issued in absentia must be filed within 180 days of the order. The primary issue before us, an issue of first impression, is whether the 180-day time limitation is mandatory and jurisdictional, or whether it is analogous to a statute of limitations and therefore can be equitably tolled. If it is the latter, we must decide whether fraud constitutes a basis for equitable tolling.

We hold that the 180-day time limitation can be equitably tolled, and can be tolled for fraud. As such, we will remand this case to the Board of Immigration…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. Reyes Mata v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Soriba Fadiga v. Attorney General USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. Jose Cruz v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Syed Mahmood v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Leslie v. Attorney General of USCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API