Jose Borges v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
A motion to reopen a removal order issued in absentia must be filed within 180 days of the order. The primary issue before us, an issue of first impression, is whether the 180-day time limitation is mandatory and jurisdictional, or whether it is analogous to a statute of limitations and therefore can be equitably tolled. If it is the latter, we must decide whether fraud constitutes a basis for equitable tolling.
We hold that the 180-day time limitation can be equitably tolled, and can be tolled for fraud. As such, we will remand this case to the Board of Immigration…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- Reyes Mata v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Soriba Fadiga v. Attorney General USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Jose Cruz v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Syed Mahmood v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Leslie v. Attorney General of USCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.