Legal Opinion
Anderson Buick Co. v. Cook
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1941No. 28195PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
This action was brought by Anderson Buick Company, a corporation, against F. Miller Cook, Arthur M. Hare, Theodore S. Turner and David A. Maurier, doing business as Hare, Turner & Maurier, and William B. Severyns, as sheriff of King county, to recover judgment on a note and foreclose a chattel mortghge, which it is claimed was given to secure the note. Defendants Hare, Turner & Maurier, by virtue of an attachment, claimed a prior lien on the property described in the chattel mortgage.
The material facts are not in dispute. On September 19, 1939, plaintiff loaned defendant Cook $408.70, taking…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Welch v. SackettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- First National Bank v. National Grain CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- First National Bank v. OppenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Foster v. BerkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
- Gilmore v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- D. K. Porter, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Abe Greenband v. Woodey B. Searle and Edlean E. SearleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Desimone v. SpenceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. HambrightWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Smith v. MORAN, WINDES & WONG, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Smith v. Moran, Windes & Wong, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.