Legal Opinion

Bass v. Shreveport-Eldorado Pipe Line Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1926No. 2553PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

Plaintiff brings this suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act No. 20 of 1914 and amendments) to recover 65% of his wages for 100 weeks for the loss of an eye due to an accident which he alleges arose out of and during the course of his employment.

The defense is that the accident which caused plaintiff to lose his eye- did not arise out of or in the course of his employment, and that the occupation of “water-boy”, in which plaintiff is > engaged, is not hazardous under the statute.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for and defendant appealed.

OPINION

Under the view…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prevost v. Gheens Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Lagrone v. McIntyre Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. CurrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Nesmith v. Reich Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  3. Neyland v. Maryland Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Pillen v. Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Boutte v. R. L. Roland & SonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API