Legal Opinion
Boutte v. R. L. Roland & Son
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1931No. 3895PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.
Plaintiff, a journeyman bricklayer, sued for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Louisiana (Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended), alleging total disability, and asks for judgment for the maximum amount allowed under the said law for a period not to exceed four hundred weeks. He makes defendants in the case R. L. Roland & Son, a co-partnership composed of Robert L. Roland and Robert L. Roland, Jr., and the Georgia Casualty Company, the insurer of Roland & Son. He alleges that on the 22d day of January, 1930, defendants Roland & Son, through their duly authorized foreman and agent,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Prevost v. Gheens Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- LeBlanc v. Ohio Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Bass v. Shreveport-Eldorado Pipe Line Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nesmith v. Reich Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Banks v. Associated Indemnity CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Neyland v. Maryland Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- Crysel v. R.W. Briggs Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Thompson v. Glen Hill Gravel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.