Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 1, 1982No. 818SC1279PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant raises several assignments of error on appeal. None of them disclose prejudicial error.

In Assignment of Error No. 1, defendant argues that the court erred in failing to allow him to cross-examine the prosecuting witness as to whether she had filed a civil lawsuit for damages against him based on the facts involved in the prosecution. We agree that the court improperly limited the scope of cross-examination.

Cross-examination of an opposing witness for the purpose of showing his bias or interest is a substantial legal right. Jurors are to consider evidence of any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. FerebeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. FerebeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. GlennCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API