Legal Opinion

Chaney v. Lehman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2007No. 05-36116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Samantha G. Chaney, Ryan L. Tatt, Brendalyn D. Marshall, and Joshua J. Bradford (“Class Plaintiffs”), a class of individuals who are, were, or will be incarcerated by the Washington State Department of Corrections (“DOC”) beyond the first date they were or would be eligible for release into community custody, appeal from the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Joseph D. Lehman, the former Secretary of the DOC, after concluding that the action was barred under qualified immunity. We affirm.

The Class Plaintiffs argue that release…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of DutcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of LiptrapCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carver v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Carver v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Carver v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API