Legal Opinion

Willman v. Friedman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from order of District Judge, Alturas County. A copy of the cross-complaint had to be served upon the plaintiff personally within the territory or the state of Idaho ;. and there was no such appearance on the part of the plaintiff in such cross-action as to waive such service and confer jurisdiction upon the court as to such cross-action.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from order of District Judge, Alturas County. A copy of the cross-complaint had to be served upon the plaintiff personally within the territory or the state of Idaho ;. and there was no such appearance on the part of the plaintiff in such cross-action as to waive such service and confer jurisdiction upon the court as to such cross-action. (Rev. Stats., sec. 4184; Connor v. Winter, 7 Ind. 523; Lovejoy v. Robinson,. 8 Ind. 400; Slayback v. Jones, 9 Ind. 470; Harris v. Rivers, 53 Ind. 216; City of Lewiston v. Booth, ante, p. 692, 34 Pae. 809; HeiTbron v. Canal Co., 76 Cal. 15,17 Pac. 933;…

1Opinion of the CourtHuston, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Alturas county discharging an attachment. The plaintiff filed his complaint in the district court, which complaint contained several causes of action, separately stated. The first cause of action, as set forth in the complaint, arose upon a promissory note made by the defendant, and (as is alleged in the complaint) “one Myers Cohn also wrote his name thereon, as surety, thus: 'Myers Cohn.’ ” It is further alleged, in regard to said note, “that Fred. J. Keisel & Co. indorsed the same by writing and indorsing their names on the back…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gessner v. PalmateerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Murphy v. MontandonIdaho Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mark Means Transfer Co. v. MackinzieIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Willman v. FriedmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ross v. Gold Ridge Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Richmond Terminal Corp. v. Parr Terminal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Vollmer v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API