Legal Opinion
State v. McNamara
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 15, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment finding him guilty of embezzlement, alleging refusal to charge as requested and as required by the facts claimed to have been proved, error in the charge and in rulings on evidence.
The state offered evidence and claimed to have proved the following facts: The defendant was appointed city tax marshal by the tax collector of Bridgeport on July 20, 1933, and continued as such until January 25, 1940. By custom, acquiesced in by the tax collector, the defendant did not turn in partial collections on small accounts but was permitted to withhold them until…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- State v. EnannoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Commonwealth v. LannanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Commonwealth v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- State v. LanyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Town of Brookfield v. Candlewood Shores Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- DiPalma v. WiesenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. RadzvilowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Lowell v. DalySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.