Legal Opinion
Pudalov v. Brogan
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur D. Spatt, J.
This motion by plaintiff for an order dismissing the affirmative defenses and counterclaim pursuant to CPLR 3212; by Mulholland, Minion, Roe & Clifford, Esqs., the attorneys for plaintiff on the counterclaim, for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], pars 6, 7) dismissing the counterclaim; by defendant for an order voiding plaintiff’s perference and directing that this action follow the trial of the case entitled Brogan v Zummo; and by plaintiff for an order of preclusion pursuant to CPLR 3042 (subd [d]), are determined as set forth below.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of KrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Adams v. . the Fort Plain BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Reubenbaum v. B. & H. Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martin, Van de Walle, Guarino & Donohue v. YohayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- in Re Texas Collegiate Baseball League, Ltd. and Gerald W. Haddock, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- in Re Texas Collegiate Baseball League, Ltd. and Gerald W. Haddock, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012