Legal Opinion

Kwasky v. Serpa

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1967No. Civ. No. 23852Published

1Opinion of the CourtRattigan, J.

Appeal from a judgment of final distribution under a will and codicil.

Appellant and respondent (herein Lois and Virginia, respectively) are sisters, daughters of the testatrix. Her husband, the parties’ father, was Lutral E. Moore. The testatrix executed her will on July 11, 1953. The will appointed *947Lutral E. Moore her executor and instructed him to perform the conventional functions, including the payment of debts, expenses and taxes.

In the paragraph designated “Sixth” in the 1953 will, the testatrix left her entire estate to Mr. Moore. In the event of his predecease, or of the deaths of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marti v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Land v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Mallarino v. HammersmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Estate of MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API