Legal Opinion

Swift v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 2, 2006No. 98, Sept. Term, 2005PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying petitioner’s motion to suppress a controlled dangerous substance seized from him by the police. Petitioner Logan Hamilton Swift appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of contraband obtained by the police. Because a reasonable person would not have felt free to leave under the circumstances in which the police officer encountered petitioner, and the police officer lacked any reasonable suspicion to stop petitioner, we shall hold that the Circuit Court for Wicomico County erred in denying petitioner’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. Garcia-CantuCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API