Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 5, 1992No. 91-182PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The defendant, Douglas R. Smith, was convicted after a jury trial in Superior Court (McHugh, J.) of aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2, XI, and attempted aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2, XI and 629:1, committed upon his nine-year-old step-daughter. He appeals his convictions. He argues that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of the victim’s venereal infection because the evidence was not relevant, or, if it was relevant, because its probative value was outweighed by its prejudicial effect. He further argues that the trial court improperly excluded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LeuthnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. State v. McCueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. State v. EldridgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. State v. CaplinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. State v. LurveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. Rodriguez v. WebbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. State v. WalshSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. State v. GuyetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API