State v. McCue
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from a jury verdict in the Superior Court (Temple, J.) finding him guilty of the first degree murder of Aleñe Courchesne. He challenges his conviction on two grounds, claiming first, that the circumstantial evidence for conviction was insufficient since it did not support the exclusion of all rational conclusions other than the defendant’s guilt. Second, he argues that the trial court committed reversible error in denying a motion in limine seeking to exclude the investigating officers’ use of the term “drag marks” in reference to the area where the body was discovered.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Roy v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. CyrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. WhitneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GermainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. NewcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.