Legal Opinion
State v. Leuthner
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 6, 1984No. 82-503PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The defendant was tried on two indictments, one for attempted murder and one for burglary. RSA 629:1; RSA 635:1. The jury found him not guilty on both indictments but convicted him of the lesser-included offense of first-degree assault. RSA 631:1 (Supp. 1981).
On this appeal, he argues that the Trial Court {Wyman, J.) committed reversible error by allowing irrelevant and highly prejudicial evidence to be presented to the jury. He also argues that the denial of his motion in limine, which allowed the State’s rebuttal case to be presented, constitutes reversible error. Because we find that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Chrzanowski, in No. 73-1591, and Alex Chrzanowski. Appeal of Alex Chrzanowski, in No. 73-1592Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- State v. RuelkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- United States v. Richard PisariCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- State v. LaBrancheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. LapageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. StearnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. NadeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. CiminoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. HotchkissSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.