German Insurance v. Eddy
Nebraska Supreme Court
Motion in supreme court by defendant in error to allow a reasonable attorney’s fee, under the valued policy act of 1889.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
The defendant in error, Ambrose Eddy, brought three actions in the district court, each on a fire insurance policy issued, respectively, by the German Fire Insurance Company of Peoria, the Queen Insurance Company, and the German Insurance Company of Freeport. The cases were tried as one, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. The companies prosecuted error to this court, and the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. It was held that the insured building was “ wholly destroyed ” within the meaning of that term as used in the valued policy law of 1889 *462(36 Neb., 461). Subsequently, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- German Insurance v. EddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. CoreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Aetna Insurance v. Glasgow Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Armstrong v. State Ex Rel. FainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Home Fire Insurance v. SkoumalNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. WrynSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.