Barbour v. Regis Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
By this appeal, Regis Corporation and Employers Insurance of Wausau (“defendants”), challenge the Industrial Commission’s opinion and award of temporary total disability compensation and medical expenses to Tammy Barbour (“plaintiff’). Specifically, defendants contend (I) plaintiff’s cervical condition is not causally related to her original injury by accident and therefore not compensable; (II) plaintiff is not disabled under the North Carolina’s Workers’ Compensation Act and therefore she is not entitled to ongoing disability benefits; and (III) defendants are not estopped…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Sims v. Charmes/Arby's Roast BeefCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Everett v. Well Care & Nursing ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Pait v. Southeastern General HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Spivey v. Wright's RoofingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Castaneda v. INTERNATIONAL LEG WEAR GROUPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Coffey v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.