Legal Opinion

New Albany Manufacturing Co. v. Sulzer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1902No. 3,804PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Clark Circuit Court; J. K. Marsh, Judge. Action by the New Albany Manufacturing Company against Oscar R. Sulzer on promissory notes and on account, and in attachment. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Action by appellant against appellee upon three promissory notes and an open account. With its complaint appellant filed an affidavit and bond in attachment. A writ of attachment was issued, and certain personal property seized thereunder. The ground of the attachment was the nonresidence of appellee. He appeared personally to the action and filed answer, to which appellant replied. Appellee filed a bond, under §940 Burns 1901, for restitution of the property attached. There is no necessity for stating *90the pleadings, for the court made a special finding of facts, and stated its conclusions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. McVeaghIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lester v. WatkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winter v. Union Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Douglas v. Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Eberhart v. Eyre-Shoemaker, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Beatty v. McClellanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Van Den Biggelaar v. WagnerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API