Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Decatur Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 12, 1943No. 8066PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
By contract of May 31, 1935, appellee agreed to sell, and appellant agreed to buy, certain real estate situated in the District of Columbia. The contract was in the common form of an agreement, to buy and sell for a price stated, except that it contained the following sentence: “This agreement to be null and void in the event the property is not made available for industrial use or in the event the Party of the Second Part [appellee] is unable to obtain wharfage facilities and the privilege of running a pipe line from said wharf to the property aforesaid.” Appellee…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Stephen S. Pstragowski v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Orise B. Pstragowski v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Weldon A. Price v. Susanne Neyland, as Next Friend of Michele Marie Neyland, an Infant, and Herbert NeylandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.