Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Madovoy
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 14, 1949No. Civ. No. 9913PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
The motion is for a dismissal of the complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., as against the defendants B. Kittay & Sons, Mayfair Merchandise Co., M & A Wares Co., Greenman Bros., Inc. and L. A. Sales Co., Inc., for want of jurisdiction.
The complaint alleges infringement of design letters patent No. 107,672, of trademark registration No. 355,044, and of copyright A-282,542.
The plaintiffs are citizens of Connecticut. The defendants are alleged to be citizens of New York. The defendants Minerva Toy Co. and Davis Bros, are located…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Fischer v. KarlDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1949
3Cited by6 opinions
- C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co. v. Barnes, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Joseph P. Ruth, Sometimes Also Known as J. P. Ruth v. The Eagle-Picher Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Kamkap, Inc. v. Worldsbest Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Jones v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co. v. Barnes, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.