Legal Opinion
Reed v. Blinzinger
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 2, 1987No. Nos. 86-1780, 86-1816PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Chief Judge.
We hereby adopt the thorough and well reasoned district court opinion written by Judge Steckler below, Reed v. Blinzinger, 639 F.Supp. 130 (S.D.Ind.1986), and also concur in the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit's decision in Vance v. Hegstrom, 793 F.2d 1018 (9th Cir.1986). We believe that both the district court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals correctly determined that the express exclusion of sibling income in determining Medicaid eligibility, see 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(17)(D), is not contradicted by any clear expression of legislative intent, notwithstanding the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vance v. HegstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Reed v. BlinzingerDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1986
- Baldwin Ex Rel. Baldwin v. LedbetterDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Olson v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Patrick Addis v. Gerald Whitburn, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- The State Of Georgia Department Of Medical Assistance v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Childress v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Georgia Department of Medical Assistance v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.