Legal Opinion

Vance v. Hegstrom

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1986No. Nos. 85-4050, 85-4065PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

State appellants Hegstrom and Putnam (No. 85-4050) and federal appellant Secretary of Health and Human Services Bowen (No. 85-4065) appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees. 629 F.Supp. 747. The sole issue on appeal is whether sibling income, which a state must include in computing income available to a family to determine AFDC eligibility under 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38), may be included in computing that family’s available income to deny Medicaid benefits. We hold that it cannot and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

FACTS

T…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Olson v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Malloy v. EichlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. 18 soc.sec.rep.ser. 65, Medicare&medicaid Gu 36,369 Raymon and Joann Lynch v. William Dawson, Defendants-Third Party and Otis Bowen, M.D., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Ward v. WallaceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1987
  5. Patrick Addis v. Gerald Whitburn, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API