Legal Opinion
Reed v. Blinzinger
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 14, 1986No. IP 85-1353-CPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STECKLER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction and on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The Court consolidated the hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction with a hearing on the summary judgment motions. Having heard evidence and arguments on both motions and having considered the exhibits and briefs, the Court finds that plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Therefore, plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction is moot.
Plaintiffs have been certified as a class under Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Olson v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Vance v. HegstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ward v. WallaceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1987
- Patrick Addis v. Gerald Whitburn, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Vance v. HegstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.