Henderson v. Balcom
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
The sole question presented upon this appeal by defendant Balcom alone, from an order granting new trial as to all defendants after a jury verdict in favor of all defendants, is whether there was any substantial evidence that would have supported a verdict in favor of plaintiff against defendant Balcom. *
Evidence
The accident, for injuries incurred in which plaintiff brought this action, occurred February 1, 1952, at about 8 p.m. on El Camino highway. The street was wet, but at the time of the accident it was either raining very lightly or not at all. The general area was fairly well lighted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Champagne v. A. HamBurger & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Haverstick v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Deshotel v. Atchison & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bilyeu v. Standard Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Britton v. GundersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958