Parker v. McCaw
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
Parties seek a court order to resolve their disputes through two arbitration agreements. One agreement provides for one arbitrator, the other provides for three arbitrators. The trial court determines that the issues to be resolved under the agreements are so intertwined that it orders them consolidated and to be decided by a single arbitrator.
Here we hold, among other things, that the contractual right to three arbitrators is substantial and may not be altered by the court.
Defendants Wendy P. McCaw, Ampersand Holdings, Inc., Ampersand Telecom LLC, and Joseph Cole,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Habash v. L.A Pacific Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Giullanoi v. Inland Empire Personnel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- In re the Arbitration Between UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME, LOCAL 646 & State, Department of TransportationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
- Biber v. DIAMOND HILL JOINT VENTURENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- In Re United Pub. Workers, Afscme, Loc. 646Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010