McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
In this corporate franchise tax controversy, a hearing was granted by this court, after decision by the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three, for the purpose of giving further study to the problems presented. After such study we have concluded that the opinion of the Court of Appeal, prepared by Presiding Justice Ford, correctly treats and disposes of the issues involved, and with certain further comments pertinent to contentions urged, it is adopted as and for the opinion of this court. Such opinion (with appropriate deletions and additions as indicated) is as follows :
T…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- International Harvester Co. v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- General Motors Corp. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- El Dorado Oil Works v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Simmons v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cooper v. Leslie Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Keizer v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Chase Brass & Copper Co. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.