Legal Opinion

Potts v. Whitehead

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1872PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion of the Chancellor is reported in 5 C. JE. Green 55.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Woodhull, J.

The appellant seeks to enforce the specific performance of an alleged agreement in writing for the sale of land. To show the agreement, two separate writings are relied on : the first, an oiler to sell, dated December 7th, 1865, to be accepted within thirty days from the date, signed by the respondent; and the other, a letter dated January 3d, 1866, written by the appellant, accepting, as he alleges, the offer of December 7th.

The principal questions discussed before us were: 1. Whether the letter of January 3d amounted to a legal acceptance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carr v. DuvalSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Orr v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Looman Realty Corp. v. BROAD ST. NAT. BK., TRENTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Heim & Hillbrook Acres, Inc. v. ShoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. Hardy v. HangenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. 243 So. Harrison St. Corp. v. OgustNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API