Legal Opinion

243 So. Harrison St. Corp. v. Ogust

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 12, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

113 N.J. Super. 74 (1971)

272 A.2d 578

243 SO. HARRISON STREET CORP. A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

LOUIS OGUST AND LILLIAN OGUST, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, District Court, Essex County.

Decided January 12, 1971.

Mr. David M. Beckerman for plaintiff (Messrs. Beckerman, Franzblau & Cohen).

Mr. Louis Ogust, pro se for defendants.

YANOFF, J.D.C.

The simple question in this case is whether a lease termination provision which provides for notice by registered mail may be exercised by certified mail. The lease provided:

That this letting and hiring shall be extended and renewed by and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Unico v. OwenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. Fletcher v. Interstate Chemical Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  4. Pacific Discount Co., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  5. Fletcher v. Interstate Chemical Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Sosanie v. Pernetti Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. Suss Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. BoddickerColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. 126 SOUTH STREET OWNER, LLC VS. SUZI'S SKIN AND NAIL CARE STUDIO, INC. (LT-000455-17, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API