Legal Opinion
Arnold Chapman & Paldo Sign & Display Co. v. Wagener Equities, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 31, 2014No. 14-8004PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The defendants in this class action suit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, seek our leave to *491appeal from the district court’s order certifying the class. Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(f). The defendants are a business that manages commercial real estate properties for the properties’ owners, and the owner of the business. The suit charges the defendants with having paid a “fax blaster” called Business to Business Solutions to send unsolicited fax advertisements, in violation of the Act’s “junk fax” prohibition, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C), to 10,145 persons.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- CE Design Ltd. v. King Architectural Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Ira Holtzman v. Gregory TurzaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Conocophillips Company v. Jeana ParkoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Blair v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Palm Beach Golf Center-Boca, Inc. v. John G. Sarris, D.D.S., P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. Medtox Scientific, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- American Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Lake City Industrial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Cunningham v. Rapid Response Monitoring Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.